By Peter R. Neumann
Just over three years after the launch of the military campaign against Islamic State, the United States-led Global Coalition, together with Iraqi and Kurdish forces, have accomplished their mission. Ninety-eight per cent of the territory Islamic State had once held in Syria and Iraq has been recaptured. The Caliphate’s most important cities, Raqqa and Mosul, are no longer controlled by jihadists. And of the 40,000 men who once fought for Islamic State, only 3,000 are thought to be left, hiding in the desert and hoping to survive.
Needless to say, the situation is not quite as rosy as the statistics suggest. While much of the territory has been recaptured, Islamic State as an organisation continues to exist, and none of the political conflicts that fuelled its rise – most importantly, the Syrian civil war – have been resolved. Moreover, Islamic State has never just been a territorial project, but also a utopia and a transnational terrorist network, which has attracted and inspired tens of thousands of followers from all over the world.
What does its military defeat in Syria and Iraq mean for the group’s ability to carry out terrorist attacks? Will its terrorist campaign in Europe, which has targeted Paris, London, Brussels, Berlin, Stockholm and other major European cities, continue?
No one can predict with confidence where or what Islamic State will be in five years’ time. Although the group may want to intensify its terrorist campaign, it is far from certain whether its supporters will respond with the same enthusiasm that they showed in 2014 when the Caliphate seemed unstoppable. And while returning foreign fighters will become more significant in terrorist plots, this will not automatically result in a higher number of attacks, but more likely increase their complexity.
In short, Islamic State’s terrorist campaign won’t just stop, because too many people have been drawn into the jihadist orbit over the past five years. But its physical decline raises serious doubts about the long-term trajectory and viability of Islamic State as a project and organisation.
Responding to Failure
There can be no doubt that the demise of the physical Caliphate has had an impact on the group’s strategy. Long gone are the days when the self-declared Caliph, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was calling on Muslims across the world to abandon their “decadent homelands” and migrate to the Islamic State.
For more than a year now, the group has been telling its followers to stay where they are and fight the infidels “where it hurts them most”. Rather than being one of several options, terrorism is now presented as a duty.
This is reflected in the group’s propaganda output, which is focusing less on promoting the utopia that Islamic State had supposedly created, but increasingly consists of crude and, arguably, desperate exhortations to attack Western targets. During the last week of 2017 alone, the group published four high-quality videos which sought to inspire attacks on New Year’s Eve.
However, this tells us little about the extent to which the group’s message continues to resonate. In fact, there is no evidence that the physical Caliphate has morphed into a ‘virtual’ one, as is often alleged. On the contrary, the group’s propaganda output has massively declined since its peak in 2015. According to my colleague Charlie Winter, more than three quarters of Islamic State’s media offices, which produced the daily deluge of propaganda videos and online magazines, have closed down. “It is almost as if someone has pressed the mute button”, he wrote in a recent article.
Instead of populating mainstream social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, Islamic State supporters have been pushed into the darker corners of the internet, especially the private messaging app Telegram, where reaching out to new supporters is more difficult.
What’s more, some of the internal debates have become critical of the organisation. Even the most passionate supporters can now be observed questioning whether Islamic State, which had proclaimed a thousand-year Reich, and whose motto was “remaining and expanding”, can survive its physical destruction. The excitement and enthusiasm, which permeated these forums in 2014 and 2015, is gone.
Increasing Complexity
At the same time, it would be mistaken to declare the terrorist threat to be over. The Syrian civil war and the rise of Islamic State have rejuvenated the global jihadist movement. More than 5,000 Western Europeans have travelled to Syria, with thousands more who have cheered the group’s victories from home. Since the attack on the Jewish Museum in Brussels in May 2014, jihadists have been responsible for plotting more than a hundred attacks in Europe. In 41 instances, they were successful.
While the chances are slim that this campaign will suddenly come to an end, its nature and dynamics are certain to change. So far, less than a fifth of the jihadist plots in Europe involved attackers who had been fighters in Syria. Nearly two thirds consisted of lone attackers, who were planning to use unsophisticated weapons such as knives, machetes, hammers, or vehicles. Although many of them had previously been on the security agencies’ “radar”, few had terrorist training or were capable of handling explosives.
The steady trickle of returning fighters, who have spent time in terrorist training camps and participated in the Syrian civil war, will change this. Like in previous conflicts, only a minority of the so-called “returnees” will become involved in terrorism. But their numbers could be sufficient to “professionalise” Islamic State’s campaign in Europe by inserting experienced fighters who have worked in teams, know how to build bombs, and have the charisma and credibility that result from being “jihad veterans”.
It may be no accident that Islamic State’s most devastating operation in Europe – the November 2015 attacks in Paris, which killed 137 people – was planned and executed by a team of returnees. Indeed, as time goes by and the superficial appeal of the Islamic State “brand” continues to fade, more experienced and ideologically committed members are likely to play a bigger role.
The Crime-Terror Nexus
One of the most significant facts about Islamic State recruits in Europe is their close proximity to “ordinary” crime. In most Western European countries, more than half of the group’s recruits have criminal pasts, often as members of gangs, drug dealers, thieves, or burglars. For many of these young men, joining Islamic State was a way of seeking redemption. In the words of a Danish fighter, “It’s not good enough just praying with all the shit I’ve done”.
This currently provides Islamic State with many advantages. Not only do their European followers find it easy to acquire weapons and forged documents, many have been radicalised and recruited in prisons where criminal and jihadist milieus are overlapping. When released, they have funded their attacks through petty crime – be it by trading in counterfeit goods, dealing drugs, or stealing people’s wallets.
However, the nexus between crime and terror can go both ways. Right now, it is fuelling terrorism and helping to facilitate attacks against innocent civilians. But if Islamic State is no longer seen as credible, successful, or sufficiently “cool” to attract attention, some of their recruits may return to their criminal pasts. What started out as the quest for a global Caliphate may, in the very long term, end up as a bunch of local gangs.
0 Response to "ICSR Insight – ISIS And Terrorism In Europe: What Next?"
Post a Comment